Senior managers and technology executives are performing in their current roles — not on job boards. I find them through direct, systematic search. I assess them rigorously. And I bring you a shortlist you would not build yourself.
I also design human capital frameworks that enable the people you hire to perform — and to stay.
See how I work
I run end-to-end executive searches for companies hiring senior managers and technology leaders. The process is systematic: I map the full market, contact every relevant candidate without exception, and assess against a competency model built specifically for the role.
The difference is coverage. Most searches stop at people who respond to outreach or apply. Mine don't end until every relevant candidate has been approached directly. That's where the candidates who actually change businesses are found.
Before any sourcing begins, we define what excellent looks like for this specific role. Competency models built using a structured leadership competency framework — a precise framework against which every candidate is measured.
The market is mapped in full to identify where the right candidate is most likely working today — the foundation for every direct approach that follows.
Every candidate on the list is contacted directly — by phone and email. No exceptions. This is what most searches never do. The result is access to candidates who would never have entered the process otherwise.
In-person or online interviews with every candidate approached during the search. The conversations filter the field to those whose capability and motivation align with the role — and only the candidates who progress form the long list.
Deep behavioural interviews against the competency framework. Only candidates who genuinely match the brief reach your final stage. Every name on the shortlist is there for a specific, documented reason.
A CEO appointment for a firm entering its next growth phase. The appointed candidate was subsequently named on the Forbes 30 Under 30 list.
A first external CEO for a technical founding team. The appointment broadened commercial leadership without disrupting the engineering culture that had defined the company.
An IT Director leading manufacturing technology across France and Spain. A role that had previously failed to attract credible candidates through conventional channels.
A senior technical hire for a critical global infrastructure project. Delivered through complex market analysis and direct approach to candidates not visible through conventional channels.
Every person approached during a search — whether they reach the shortlist or not — receives considered, timely feedback. The way your business is represented in each of those conversations is held to the same standard as the search itself.
Every search begins by defining what excellence looks like in the specific role — built as a leadership competency model. Structured, deep behavioural interviewing against that framework forms the basis of every assessment that follows.
The most performant cultures are not built on diagnostic exercises or aspirational values. They are built on a clear, shared articulation of what the company does exceptionally well — the distinct value it creates for its clients, the qualities its people take genuine pride in, and the work that consistently produces the outcomes that matter most. Once those are named and shared across the organisation, performance culture has the ground beneath it.
The work begins with disciplined inquiry across leadership and operating teams: identifying the company's most distinctive capabilities, the specific value those create for clients, and the conditions under which its best work is reliably produced. What follows is the design of the feedback and performance architecture that translates that shared understanding into a consistent operational standard.
A company whose distinct strengths are named, communicated, and reinforced — both internally with its people and externally with its clients — is one in which pride and performance reinforce each other as a single outcome, not as separate ambitions.
A fast-growing technology company had built its early technical team through its founders' academic networks. As technical requirements grew more specialised, that pool exhausted itself. The candidates they needed were neither visible nor reachable through personal connections — and the organisation had no internal capability to find them at scale.
I was engaged to design and build the company's complete talent acquisition function as an internal product: a working operational capability the organisation could rely on, not a one-off process to fill a few roles.
The delivered function comprised three components: a documented, repeatable search methodology; a configured and adopted applicant tracking system; and explicit service-level definitions for the three groups the function serves day-to-day — hiring managers, candidates, and business owners. The company moved from founder-dependent hiring to a self-contained internal capability that scales with the business.
A technology company expanding into new countries needed two things at once: the right first hires to build each market team, and the HR operational infrastructure for those hires to join when they walked through the door. Neither existed in any of the new jurisdictions.
I combined both capabilities in a single engagement: direct headhunting for the senior and technical first hires in each market, and standing up the HR operations they would join — employment frameworks, payroll, onboarding, and the operational rhythms of a functioning HR team.
The legal and compliance work itself was delivered by specialist local counsel in each jurisdiction. My role on compliance was to represent the business in that delivery — defining the brief, evaluating recommendations against operational reality, and ensuring the outputs were usable day-to-day.
The company entered each new market with hired teams and functioning HR operations from day one — not a folder of legal documents waiting to be operationalised.
As the first HR hire at a technology company scaling past 100 people across multiple countries, I was responsible for designing the HR processes the organisation had never had. The approach was specific: every process had to drive business outcomes, not run parallel to them.
The centrepiece was a performance evaluation system anchored directly to the company's business performance indicators, with integrated salary benchmarking. Managers had clear, business-linked criteria for evaluating their teams. Individual contributors had a measurable connection between their work and the company's goals. Compensation decisions sat on evidence, not negotiation.
Around this, I designed and implemented structured onboarding, off-boarding, payroll in two countries, and HRIS implementation — the full operational backbone of a functioning HR team.
The result was an HR function that actively contributed to business performance rather than operating as a separate administrative track — the kind of operational foundation that lets a company scale without losing the connection between individual work and business outcomes.
A growing organisation wanted to understand what was actually shaping the performance of its teams — beyond engagement surveys, anecdote, and assumption. The leadership team needed clarity on which conditions, behaviours, and structures were enabling people to do their best work, and which were getting in the way of it.
I designed and facilitated a two-stage diagnostic with the relevant teams. The first stage was a structured analysis of recent successful and unsuccessful work days — examining in detail what had made each what it was. The second stage took those signals and isolated the specific, concrete factors that enabled or blocked performance for each team member: the meetings, the tools, the decisions, the rhythms, the relationships.
The output was an actionable map of the organisational conditions affecting performance — grounded in what teams actually experienced day-to-day, not what leadership assumed. Leadership had concrete decisions to make on what to keep, change, or remove.
The same analysis gave the organisation an evidence-based foundation for defining its corporate culture — the specific conditions and behaviours that shape how people actually work, named clearly enough to be reinforced or replaced.
The work shifted two conversations at once: performance, from individual capability to organisational design; and culture, from aspirational statements to observed reality.
A scaling technology company was bringing in technical and non-technical hires across remote and on-site environments — and needed an onboarding experience that delivered genuine integration regardless of role, location, or background.
I designed and implemented a three-month onboarding programme in two integrated parts. The first two weeks ran on a deliberate 50/50 split. Half of the new joiner's time went into structured general onboarding — the company's history, its strategic direction, direct exposure to the founders, the communication practices that govern how work gets done, and a workshop on company culture and values. The other half was spent directly with their team. The principle behind the split: new hires want to start working with their colleagues from day one, and the programme respected that while still building the foundational understanding genuine contribution requires. Practical infrastructure — systems, accounts, accesses — was operational on day one, not chased afterwards.
From week three onwards, the programme became individual. Working in partnership with each hiring manager, I designed bespoke onboarding plans for the remaining ten weeks — calibrated to the role, the team's specific objectives, and the new hire's particular learning trajectory. The hiring manager retained ownership of their team member; the framework ensured the experience was consistent and the standards were not left to chance.
The result was an onboarding experience that delivered the same standard of integration to every joiner — remote or on-site, technical or non-technical — and turned the first three months from a vague settling-in period into a structured route to full contribution.
The terms of every engagement are defined at the outset: what will be delivered, on what timeline, and at what cost. The engagement then proceeds against that frame, leaving the work to focus on what matters most — the result.
No piece of work exists in isolation. Each engagement is designed from the outset to advance the company's broader strategic objectives — and judged against that standard, not against an internal HR metric.
Michal Fogelton has spent the past eight years inside the human capital function of the technology sector — including roles at a fintech company and a top-tier educational organisation — building the operational understanding of how technology businesses actually run, and the search depth required to populate them at senior level.
His practice combines direct executive search — for C-level appointments, senior managers, and senior technical roles — with the design and implementation of human capital management programmes: talent acquisition function build-outs, performance evaluation systems anchored to business outcomes, international HR operations, and culture mapping. Geographic focus: Central and Western Europe.
He holds professional certifications from the Josh Bersin Academy.
The work is delivered as a personal practice, not as a brokerage. Each engagement is led by Michal directly, from brief to close.
A first conversation — by call or in person — scopes the engagement and defines the project to deliver: the role, the brief, and the right approach for both sides.
References available on request.